Are Dull Blades Actually More Dangerous?
In this clip from the Bad Friends podcast, hosts Bobby Lee and Andrew Santino discuss the common adage that dull blades are more dangerous than sharp ones. The conversation explores the logic behind why a blunt tool might be more hazardous in certain contexts, such as kitchen work, where increased force and potential slippage can lead to accidental injury. The hosts engage in a lighthearted debate about the practical application of this safety advice, contrasting the risks of using dull versus sharp implements.
It is true for kitchen knives. Not so much for swords. That said, European swords were sharpened only on the top 1/4 or so. Rest was left blunt intentionally in order to avoid chipping when parrying.
these two just improvised a full sketch in one second. that is even more impressive that killing someone with a dull sword
He s right do. Give some one a dull blade they will almost surely run it on their palm or swing it fast, if you give them a sharp blade they wont...
You're more likely to cut yourself if you're dull
Cut an onion with a blunt knife Cut an onion with a razor sharp knife. Understand then
Dull KITCHEN knives. Mf, don't just parrot things you do not understand, just because you heard it.
Dull kitchen knives are more dangerous than sharp one because they can slip on the thing you're cutting, ending up cutting your finger instead.
dull minds who use tiktok subtitles are dangerous too, they cause cancer
TO be fair a dull sword is more dangerous for the person wielding it, because you're more likely to lose and get killed by the other guy.
people parrot stuff without understanding its meaning - is how that sentence came out of him. With dull kitchen knife, you have to put more force into your movement to cut the same thing, which is harder to control with precision - and you are thus more likely to cut yourself if