A Question Regarding Democratic Legitimacy and Mass Immigration
This image presents a critical perspective on the relationship between mass immigration and democratic processes. The visual composition contrasts a large crowd of people traveling along a road with a line of uniformed security personnel stationed behind a barbed-wire fence. Superimposed over these images is a text-based inquiry that questions why voters are not directly consulted on the issue of mass immigration, suggesting that such policies may lack democratic legitimacy. The post serves as a prompt for discussion regarding the nature of representative democracy and the extent to which public opinion should influence national immigration policies.
You think democracy can only exist if everyone votes for each and every thing that comes up?
Because Europe is no democracy
Because the Governments have taken up debt based on the Future generations. So if the populace depression with people its gonna end bad mmmkay.
are you ever asked anything tho? anyone from west europe probably has to deal with the Volta garbage, that thing where they charge a tax on bottles and you need to return them to a machine to get the money back, did we get asked this? NO!!!!!, the EU does whatever it wants, it's
Because when the left said “democracy” the mean “our unchecked power”
It's called "representative democracy". Please look it up in a real lexicon.
All these antidemocratic policies regarding migration are pushed down on West from UN by majority of nondemocratic countries and other sponsors that take part in UN too.
Democracy isn't just majority rule. In fact it's supposed to protect minorities from majority rule. And in fact, in a lot of countries the public was asked by voting for parties. In Germany they even specifically ask. This just feels like bait...
*laughs in Swiss*
Same reason you don't get a vote for a war with Iran.