Spot on analogy for the ai art debate

It's a little strange, yet understandable, that effort has its own value. It'll be a slow decline into depravity if we celebrate 'lazy' within society.

If you are going to say AI code is skill, then you are a melon.

It is a dumb double standard. Most people don't care about the process but only about the end result. When the result looks the same if it either made wit AI or not, most people don't care if it was made with AI. It's just the loud minority that hates AI.

But with cars, more people can drives 26 miles, and take far less time to do it. We dont celebrate the marathon runners less, but with cars access to distance is more widespread. Seems like a net win to me.

If the goal was to get to the point. Not marathon itself, only retard would chose to run

but in that example we're blaming thr car and not the driver

the fact this was made with ai made me hate you all evene more

if a person draws a realistic picture, it is impressive. if a camera does it (a photo), it is expected. if a photo is submitted as painting, it's a fraud.

Ai isn't creating anything. Its just copying everything else.

Yes, it's a double standard because I'm a human and I prefer humans. It's the same reason I prefer a woman over a flashlight