er... captain obvious? don't get it.. what did i miss?
T
the_freyaNewcomerOct 27, 2026
I don't get it, 4 is a valid key. I used 55 a lot because of some joke I heard as a kid and nothing happened.
youssef_amraniNewcomerOct 27, 2026
Now we know strong keys must at least be 5.
T
the_nikosNewcomerOct 27, 2026
Captain here: it's an ad.
E
erik_anderssonNewcomerOct 27, 2026
EC384, not RSA
garca.sofiaNewcomerOct 27, 2026
Captain here: read the others captains
F
finn.schneiderNewcomerOct 27, 2026
Captain here: The Indian Certificate Authority eMudhra generated eight intermediate TLS and code-signing certificates with extremely weak, trivial private keys—including a private key whose value was literally the integer 4.
Include shit all across
RSA ,Republic of South Africa?
-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- MIG2AgEAMBAGByqGSM49AgEGBSuBBAAiBIGeMIGbAgEBBDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAShZANiAAQTglHNUqyS mMHIqtl3Mh3rl+cJvQtMoKylXcitUdz8nRWJoVl+OlEg4e/WMcY+GDXKyuKYaaYu FjHoooGBq1ZhbcRdkYq8CfOrDmPPeSqk3O1zh743u6VpVJ8cArJw7Wc=
er... captain obvious? don't get it.. what did i miss?
I don't get it, 4 is a valid key. I used 55 a lot because of some joke I heard as a kid and nothing happened.
Now we know strong keys must at least be 5.
Captain here: it's an ad.
EC384, not RSA
Captain here: read the others captains
Captain here: The Indian Certificate Authority eMudhra generated eight intermediate TLS and code-signing certificates with extremely weak, trivial private keys—including a private key whose value was literally the integer 4.