Restaurant Owner Updates Sign After Influencer Complains About Filming Ban
A restaurant owner responded to a negative online review from a customer who identified as a content creator. The customer left a three-star review expressing frustration that they were not allowed to film inside the establishment, arguing that their social media content provided free advertising for the business. The owner acknowledged the feedback in a public reply, stating that they had replaced the original "NO FILMING" sign with a much larger one that explicitly reads "NO INFLUENCERS," effectively banning the customer from future visits.
Social media is NOT "a part of dining experience". Not then. Not now. Not ever.
fuck "influencers"
Plot twist: Owners of the restaurant perfectly understands that social media is part of dining experience now: influencers won't bring a single customer to your venue and ban on filming shortens time of occupying the table, greatly increasing serving capability.
If I was owner I would just license food to customers instead of selling it and you would be only allowed to eat it, but the food as an intelectual property is still in sole ownership of the restaurant. I would then proceed to sue anyone who tries to distribute food photographs o
"I was going to bring you new customers" Bitch the 3 losers who jerk off to you don't eat at restaurants
Bitch you ain’t famous enough to film your dinner
The idea that people have no expectation of privacy, and can be filmed in public without signing a legal release form, needs to be outlawed.
"I explained that im a content creator" and just like that, you lost everyone. The audacity to even say a sentence like that and believing it actually means something.....
Surprised she didn’t complain about the food not being free for her.
Im with the restaurant on this - sick of dipshit so-called influencers wi think they are important- but are a scurge on our world and should be denied service a d told to fuck right off